E.g: Most children like playing and hate being given more homework. 2. Most ( adv) = very/ extremely. E.g: This task is most important ( = extremely important) 3. Most : dạng so sánh bậc nhất của much/many. Eg: I love my mom (the) most. Yes, them is also a pronoun, specifically a third person plural object pronoun. Like they, it refers to a group of more than two people. It is nongendered, as well. Unlike they, however, them is an object pronoun. It replaces nouns that are the objects of sentences. See the examples below, 6. (3,149)Imagine playing with your favorite beats from sunrise to sunrise on a single charge. 25, but there’s a lot more to it than meets the eye. · It wouldn’t be CES 2022 without plenty of new Bluetooth speakers, and JBL’s most exciting entry is the Boombox 3 : an IP67-rated beast offering big. 3. Glucose, a type of sugar, is a crucial source for energy for living organisms. The researchers also discovered that in a mouse model, when the gene was deleted, the tumor did not grow as fast. The (BRIGHT MLS) Sold: 4 beds, 3.5 baths, 3806 sq. ft. house located at 6047 Greenway Ct, Manassas, VA 20112 sold for $770,000 on Oct 17, 2022. MLS# VAPW2035022. Welcome to this newly renovated luxury SFH located i Vay Tiền Nhanh Chỉ Cần Cmnd. A lawyer for Prince Harry finished setting out the royal’s case against a newspaper publisher on Thursday, quizzing a former tabloid reporter about information inserted into stories by then-editor Piers Morgan. On the final day of evidence, attorney David Sherborne grilled former Daily Mirror royal correspondent Jane Kerr, whose byline appears on several of the 33 articles cited by Harry as examples of unlawful intrusion by publisher Mirror Group Newspapers. The lawyer suggested to Kerr that some of the information in her stories came from phone hacking. “It absolutely didn’t,” Kerr said with a touch of anger. “I’ve never intercepted a voicemail. I wouldn’t even know how,” Kerr added. She also denied knowing about lawbreaking by any freelance journalists or private investigators employed by the newspaper. Kerr acknowledged in her written witness statement that Morgan, who edited the Daily Mirror between 1995 and 2004, “would occasionally direct or inject information into a story” without her knowing the source. Asked by Sherborne about quotes in one story, she said “I can’t say for sure where I got them from, because I can’t remember. It’s possible Piers gave them to me.” Morgan has denied knowing about phone hacking at the Mirror, and the company is contesting Harry’s claims. Mirror Group has previously paid more than 100 million pounds $125 million to settle hundreds of unlawful information-gathering claims, and printed an apology to phone hacking victims in 2015. Harry, who flew from his home in California to testify earlier in the week, was not at the High Court on Thursday. He spent a day and a half in the witness box on Tuesday and Wednesday answering questions about his claim that British tabloids had unlawfully snooped on his life throughout his childhood and young adulthood. He alleges that the Mirror newspapers hacked phones, bugged vehicles and used other illicit methods to obtain personal information they splashed as royal scoops. He said the intrusion poisoned relations with friends, teachers and girlfriends — and even caused friction with brother Prince William – and led to “bouts of depression and paranoia.” Mirror Group Newspapers has apologized for one instance in which it hired a private investigator to dig up dirt on Harry, which was not among the claims he has brought. It either denies or does not admit his claims. Harry, 38, is one of four claimants whose lawsuits against Mirror Group Newspapers are being heard together at the High Court in London. Hearings are due to last until the end of June, with the judge, Timothy Fancourt, likely to deliver his ruling several weeks later. Harry left royal life in 2020, citing unbearable media scrutiny and alleged racism toward his wife, Meghan, and is on a mission to reform the British media. He is also suing two other newspaper publishers over alleged to Well Adjusted, our newsletter full of simple strategies to work smarter and live better, from the Fortune Well team. Sign up today. Anonymous Guest 1 In my TOEFL preparation book I have this example, There are six types of flamingos all, __________ have long legs, long necks, and beaks that curve sharply downward. On empty line I should choose one of this answers 1. of them 2. that 3. of which 4. they Ok, 2 and 4 I scratched right away, and I was thinking a little about whether "of them" or "of which" but "of them" sounded more familiar to me due to movies I guess so I choosed that BUT I saw later that its wrong. The right answer is "of which". Can someone explain me why is this? Would it be acceptable to use "all of them" in this exaple, if not where may I use it? Please dont use much grammer in explanation since I dont understand things that way, all my english is based on listening english/usa radio/movies and reading texts/books. Thanks 2 There are six types of flamingos all, __________ have long legs, long necks, and beaks that curve sharply downward. 1. of them 2. that 3. of which 4. they There's a comma , at the end of "all". That comma separates "all" from the phrase "of which". That is, "of which" is not part of "all". "of which" can be deleted without changing the meaning of the sentence ...flamingos all have long legs.... OK But, ...flamingos all, have long legs... Not Ok The comma separates the subject 'flamingos all' from the verb 'have'. And, ...flamingos all, of them have long legs... Not Ok. The phrase "all of them" is a set phrase. But the comma separates the head of the phrase "all" from its object "of them". So, let's move the comma ...flamingos, all of them, have long legs... OK No comma The difference between "of them" and "of which" is this "of which" functions as a modifier, whereas "of them" functions as an object. Objects are keepers don't separate them from their heads and don't delete them, whereas modifiers can be separated from the words they modify and they can be deleted, just like "of which" in our example "There are six types of flamingos all, of which have long legs, long necks, and beaks that curve sharply downward." All the best, Cas 3 Miks said In my TOEFL preparation book I have this example, There are six types of flamingos all, __________ have long legs, long necks, and beaks that curve sharply downward. On empty line I should choose one of this answers 1. of them 2. that 3. of which 4. they Ok, 2 and 4 I scratched right away, and I was thinking a little about whether "of them" or "of which" but "of them" sounded more familiar to me due to movies I guess so I choosed that BUT I saw later that its wrong. The right answer is "of which". Can someone explain me why is this? Would it be acceptable to use "all of them" in this exaple, if not where may I use it? Please dont use much grammer in explanation since I dont understand things that way, all my english is based on listening english/usa radio/movies and reading texts/books. Thanks The choice depends on punctuation. Unfortunately, the punctuation in the book is in error. There are two possibilities. 1. There are six types of flamingos, all of which have long legs, long necks, and beaks that curve sharply downward. 2. There are six types of flamingos; all of them have long legs, long necks, and beaks that curve sharply downward. The difference is that in the first sentence the second clause is a dependent clause modifying flamingos. The second sentence consists of two independent clauses. You could use a period full stop instead of a semicolon. 1 Hello, Which of the forms is correct? Lots of women work in the office, many of them enjoy their work. or Lots of women work in the office, many of which enjoy their work. These sentences come from a handout of my grammar class, and I am still not sure which one of the forms is correct or whether they are interchangeable. Any help would be appreciated. 2 Nowadays, which is not used of people. In this case you need whom. 3 Ok, thanks! So it doesn't matter whether I use "many of them" or "many of whom"??? 4 The meaning is the same. The difference is that many of them enjoy their work is an independent clause and should be separated by a semi-colon; many of whom enjoy their work is a dependent clause and so the comma is enough. But this is a fine detail and other people may disagree. 5 It does matter. 'Many of them' creates a new sentence, and needs to be punctuated as a sentence. 'Many of whom' creates a new clause, and needs to be punctuated as a clause. 1 ​The new buyer identified a dozen new sources for the material, ___________ proved to be reliable． A．most of them B．most of which C．most of whom D．most of those The correct answer is B. most of which. I feel A. most of them sounds good, why is it wrong? 2 Most of them would be reasonable if you punctuated the sentence differently 1 ...new sources for the material. Most of them proved to be reliable. 2 ...new sources for the material, and most of them proved to be reliable. As it is written, however, only most of which fits in that blank ...new sources for the material, most of which proved to be reliable. What sounds better? Or which one is correct? There are two people one of which is left-handed. There are two people one of them is left-handed. LMS5,54219 silver badges37 bronze badges asked Jan 5, 2017 at 1911 1 If you must choose between "which" of "them" then There are two people one of them is left-handed. would be better, but There are two people one of whom is left-handed. would be best. answered Jan 5, 2017 at 1916 gold badges63 silver badges120 bronze badges 1 " we can say There are two of them is left-handed, but I don't know who he is. or There are two persons. The one ,which is left-handed , is a teacher. answered Jan 7, 2017 at 1539 1 You must log in to answer this question. Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .

most of them và most of which